East Carolina
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
725  Brooke Kott SR 21:15
818  Stefanie Fresenius JR 21:21
987  Chelsea Hollingsworth SR 21:33
1,630  Shewit Weldense SO 22:12
1,694  Olivia Slate JR 22:16
1,830  Janet Bailey JR 22:24
1,834  Sydney Teague FR 22:24
2,238  Amanda Tomlin SR 22:51
2,311  Caitlyn Sheva FR 22:56
2,666  Samantha Teague FR 23:19
2,703  Maura McDonnell FR 23:23
2,857  Emily Grimes FR 23:37
National Rank #174 of 340
Southeast Region Rank #24 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 28.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Brooke Kott Stefanie Fresenius Chelsea Hollingsworth Shewit Weldense Olivia Slate Janet Bailey Sydney Teague Amanda Tomlin Caitlyn Sheva Samantha Teague Maura McDonnell
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/05 1219 21:10 21:24 22:55 23:35 22:29 21:55 22:27 22:48 23:34
Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/19 1238 21:21 21:19 22:25 22:38 22:47 23:15
Conference USA Championships 11/02 1174 20:48 21:17 21:55 21:51 22:21 22:51 22:56 23:23 23:50
Southeast Region Championships 11/15 1208 21:39 21:25 21:14 21:49 21:49 22:07 22:27





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.8 647 0.0 0.4 1.2 3.4 4.8 7.9 10.7 16.0 16.5 15.5 10.7 6.2 3.4 1.7 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brooke Kott 86.2 0.0 0.0
Stefanie Fresenius 94.7
Chelsea Hollingsworth 112.4
Shewit Weldense 178.2
Olivia Slate 185.0
Janet Bailey 199.5
Sydney Teague 199.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.0% 0.0 14
15 0.4% 0.4 15
16 1.2% 1.2 16
17 3.4% 3.4 17
18 4.8% 4.8 18
19 7.9% 7.9 19
20 10.7% 10.7 20
21 16.0% 16.0 21
22 16.5% 16.5 22
23 15.5% 15.5 23
24 10.7% 10.7 24
25 6.2% 6.2 25
26 3.4% 3.4 26
27 1.7% 1.7 27
28 0.8% 0.8 28
29 0.4% 0.4 29
30 0.2% 0.2 30
31 0.0% 0.0 31
32 0.0% 0.0 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0